On 29/12/21 19:37, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2021, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
Instead of using LSB packages, this version of `lsb_release` uses the
information in `/etc/os-release`. Nevertheless, the output of this version is
/etc/os-release DOES NOT contain enough information for lsb_release:
It must contain enough info, because the current `lsb_release` does get
all its information from `/usr/lib/os-release`, see
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lsb/-/blob/debian/master/lsb_release.py#L318-358
This behavior hasn't changed in the last 3 years (actually 9 years...)
Please note that the code packaged in this ITP takes into account
/etc/os-release, /usr/lib/os-release and (now also) $LSB_OS_RELEASE.
Regards,
--
Gioele Barabucci <gio...@svario.it>
