On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:42:36AM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > > Could you confirm me that my package will be DFSG-compliant ? > > > > Not entirely, but it looks like it probably will be. > > I don't agree. > The license under analysis is fully quoted below (for future reference). > I do *not* think that a work released solely under this license can be > considered to comply with the DFSG.
To sum up, I hope persuading upstream to do one of following actions: - give permission to Debian project to package his softwares (like Apache Fundation for apache-1.3 woody packages [1]), - switch license to Apache license 2.0 like [2], - switch licens to 3-clause BSD [3] or Horde BSD-like [4], - switch license to GPL [5] like other horde softwares. [1] http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/apache/apache_1.3.26-0woody6/copyright [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 [3] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/info/BSD_3Clause.html [4] http://www.horde.org/licenses/bsdl.php [5] http://www.horde.org/licenses/gpl.php Regards, -- Gregory Colpart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG:1024D/C1027A0E Evolix - Informatique et Logiciels Libres http://www.evolix.fr/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
