Hi! I have noticed that you marked my bug orphaning gftp as owned by you (which annotation then was removed).
As you can see I am still kind of maintaining gftp, even though I have marked it as orphaned. What would you say about co-maintaining the package? I would be fine with that. I noticed now recently that FTPS was compiled in, and quickly (and wrongly) enabled it in the build, uploading to unstable. This shouldn't be done, so I undid the change quickly - there are license problems with the openssl license and the GPL. [1] This however, will be solved by changing the license of gftp to the MIT license, which won't cause the same problems. Upstream is already in progress with the change. [2] After this is done we can enable the FTPS support again. The remaining bigger problem with the package is that it is still using GTK2. This is tracked at [3] and in Debian at [4]. As you probably are aware, programs that only support GTK2 will get removed from Debian sooner or later. -- Andreas Rönnquist gus...@debian.org 1: https://people.gnome.org/~markmc/openssl-and-the-gpl.html 2: https://github.com/masneyb/gftp/pull/133 3: https://github.com/masneyb/gftp/issues/91 4: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=967390
