* Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-04-24 14:06]: > It used libnss for XML signing (and libxmlsec which also uses nss).
thanks for your explaining this. Is this a required feature, not an optional one? > > > If I need to build-depend on libnss3-dev also I need to build-depend on > > > packages (libxmlsec) which want libnss-dev which libnss3-dev of course > > > conflicts upon... > > > > Since yesterday, there is a whishlist bug on libxmlsec1 [1] titled > > "Build-Dep on mozilla (library), please transition to xulrunner". By > > that, it should be easy to track progress. > > Ah, good. Well, but the maintainer seems to be rather MIA, maybe you could try to adopt that package or NMU it. Could it be reasonable to build OOo with integrated xmlsec for until the package gets fixed? Best regards, Philipp -- Philipp Sadleder http://sadleder.de
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
