On Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 01:33:06PM +0200, Stefan wrote:
What about a neomutt-openssl binary package?
IMHO there would have to be a strong compelling reason to have *both* in the archive, to overcome the drawbacks of having both: much more complex packaging, more user confusion about which to install, etc. Another thing to look at would be, how many open TLS bugs are there and would using ssl resolve them? I haven't checked, but I did just file a bug (no number yet) which is related to gnutls and the expired LE certificate root. -- 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎ j...@debian.org 🔗 https://jmtd.net
