On Tuesday 25 April 2006 21:43, you wrote:
> Gabriele Persia wrote:
> > On Monday 24 April 2006 21:25, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >>Gabriele Persia wrote:
> >>>.....
> >>
> >>Just to check: do you have a suitable package now? The standard Debian
> >>packages will not have the ISC stuff.
> >
> > apt-get "pinned version" 2.27-1
> >
> >>It will go away eventually.
> >
> > why?  :-(
>
> Because it's a hack which relies on reading the lease file without any
> locking, and with no certainty that the behaviour of the ISC code won't
> break it in the future, since it relies on undocumented behaviour of the
> ISC server.
>
> >>You  might like to think about moving to using the dnsmasq built-in
> >> server.
> >
> > Ok I will try, but (IMHO) users sould be able to choose both the dhcp
> > server and the dns proxy.
>
> If your DHCP is complicated enough to need the features of the ISC
> server, then  it's best to do the job properly, and configure it to work
> with BIND as a proxy. If the dnsmasq DHCP has enough facilities (and it
> probably has unless you have a multi-thousand address enterprise
> network), then use that; it's really easy to configure.
>
>  I mean ...what is the problem with ISC stuff? ;-)
>
> Nothing (well....), but using it with dnsmasq is second-best to two much
> more viable alternatives. Once I convince the remaining users to switch,
> I can lose that code forever...
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>


Thanks for taking the time to exhaustively explain your point, I'll switch to 
dnsmasq ;-)

Best Regards,
Gabriele

-- 
Public key available at: keyserver.pgp.com or www.keyserver.net

Attachment: pgpx6nskHill6.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to