Am Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 09:50:44AM +0200 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Hi, > > Am Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 10:43:20AM +0200 schrieb Étienne Mollier: > > Mike Bayer, on 2021-10-08: > > > you woujld have better luck changing epigrass to use automap instead: > > > https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/14/orm/extensions/automap.html > > > > Thanks Mike for your recommendation! This is very useful for me > > and others who might stumble on this bug entry. > > > > Thomas, when trying to see whether epigrass could easily be > > ported away of sqlsoup, I ended up with other issues documented > > in bug #995966. I don't know how much time is of the essence to > > you, but I don't expect a timely resolution of the issues at > > play. A reasonable course of action might be to drop epigrass > > and python-sqlsoup of Testing sooner than later, for the time > > being. What do you think? > > BTW, the epigrass author is *very* responsive to replace modules and I'd > like to recommend contacting him. (If I'm wrong with my statement I can > try via my Brasilian friends. ;-)) > > Speaking about epigrass I realise that we should remove it from > testing anyway: > > > $ /usr/bin/epirunner > ... > pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'dash' distribution was not found and > is required by epigrass
... as Étienne reported in #995966 (as I realise now and should have been reported way earlier - sorry about forgetting this). > > My last contact with upstream was about different modules for graphing > epigrass results - but after removing others he considered dash the bare > minimum ... and we do not have this. Volunteers to package dash are > extremely welcome. > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > -- > http://fam-tille.de -- http://fam-tille.de