Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > Unfortunately, I have no intention of acting on this request until the > tech-ctte has resolved their advice on how they want the /usr-merge > transition to be resolved (per #995569). > [...] > I wish I could provide you with something better, but I am personally > not ready to invest in implementing this feature while there is a > considerably risk that I would need to revert it again or it would be > interpreted as "promoting dissent" against the upcoming /usr-merge > transition[1]. > [...] > [1] I have raised objections in public about some of the /usr-merge > transition plans. I feel this is not an entirely theoretical concern > that other project members would see it as a statement from me if I was > to implement this feature without the explicit approval of the tech-ctte > at this point in time.
Hi Niels, Wow. Ugh. Thanks for your elaborate answer. Don't worry, I can certainly live without this feature, and I'm perfectly fine with this aspect being handled as a minor bullet point in the eventual /usr-merge transition plan. The main point of my report was to avoid losing sight of the issue. And you've already ensured that. :) -- Thanks again, Feri
