On 2021-10-01 14:17:53 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > In my archives, I can see that the issue occurred with > ghostscript 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1, but 9.27~dfsg-2+deb10u4 > isn't affected on my second testcase.
The following PDF file (on which I got the issue with ghostscript 9.26a~dfsg-0+deb9u1) may be a useful testcase: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02001080v1/document -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
