reopen 89920
tags 89920 upstream wontfix
thanks

On Sun, 2006-04-23 at 13:42 -0400, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 12:44:32PM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> 
> > So why not tax it "upstream" and "wontfix"?  Doesn't closing it mean
> > that it's resolved?  I remember seeing it as a wishlist item in the
> > documentation (depth sorting algorithm etc.), so why not a wishlist
> > Debian bug?
> 
> Sure, that's fine with me.  Go ahead and reopen it with tags "upstream"
> and "wontfix".

Okay, here it is.

-Adam
-- 
GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!
http://www.take6.com/albums/greatesthits.html


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to