On 20210915@22:12, Paul Gevers wrote: > Source: octave-sparsersb > Version: 1.0.8-3 > Severity: serious > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > Tags: sid bookworm > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: flaky timesout > > Dear maintainer(s), > > I looked at the results of the autopkgtest of you package on armhf > because with a recent upload of glibc the autopkgtest of > octave-sparsersb fails in testing. In august 2021, we replaced the host > we were using for armhf testing for a new one. Since then, the > autopkgtest has been failing most of the times, due to it timing out. We > should get this fixed. Do you have any ideas what could be the root > cause of this? > > Ironically, the passing tests (since the new host) report a segfault > and: Summary: 0 tests, 0 passed, 0 known failures, 0 skipped > > Don't hesitate to contact us at debian...@lists.debian.org if you need > help debugging this issue. > > Paul > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/o/octave-sparsersb/testing/armhf/ > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/o/octave-sparsersb/14991286/log.gz > > ***** test > a=sparsersb(sprand(100,100,0.4)); > nrhs=1; > maxr=1; > tmax=1; > tn=2; > sf=1; > o=sparsersb(a,"autotune","n",nrhs,maxr,tmax,tn,sf); > assert(o==a) > librsb error:The requested feature (e.g.:blocking) is not available > because it was opted out or not configured at built time. > librsb error:The requested feature (e.g.:blocking) is not available > because it was opted out or not configured at built time. > !!!!! test failed > index (_,0,_): subscripts must be either integers 1 to (2^31)-1 or logicals > ...
Dear Paul, The problem seems librsb-sided. Assuming librsb fails at detecting cache memory size, maybe can you first export e.g. RSB_USER_SET_MEM_HIERARCHY_INFO="L2:4/64/512K,L1:8/64/32K" and see if this avoids that? Same with OMP_NUM_THREADS=1 explicitly? Maybe you send me outputs of `rsbench -C` and `rsbench -I` ? If I had a guest account to such an armhf machine it would be a bit easier. Cheers, Michele
