On 9/10/21 11:40 AM, Filippo Giunchedi wrote: > On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks a lot for working on this, it really is helpful. >> >> The pull request you're pointing at contains multiple commits. Would you >> be able to transform this into a patch against the Eventlet versions >> 0.26.1 (currently in Stable) and 0.30.2 (in Unstable and Testing)? If >> you provide it, then I'll be very happy to add the patches to these >> Debian packages. If I'm asking it's not because I don't want to do it >> myself, but because you wrote it, you may be better at understanding how >> to backport the patches. > > Certainly, I did port the patch to our internal repo for Bullseye. You can > find > the commit below, which modulo the changelog version obviously should work > as-is. > > https://github.com/wikimedia/operations-debs-python-eventlet/commit/a93d2e0cd2cdf3efcd7915cb781355d58e5728ab > > I didn't change > 'Replace-dnspython-_compute_expiration-by-_compute_times.patch' > for a cleaner diff, although that patch a whole I think can be replaced with > the PR's diff. What do you think? > > best, > Filippo >
Hi, I'll try to get this in Bullseye proper. Thanks a lot for your work, this is definitively very helpful, and may solve troubles with swift's cname middleware also. I'm not sure about Replace-dnspython-_compute_expiration-by-_compute_times.patch, though it's probably better, from the Debian Stable perspective, to not touch the patches that are already there, so it is easier for the Stable release team to review it. I will also need a patch against the version 0.30.2-2 currently in unstable/bookworms (again: otherwise the Debian Stable release team may complain about it). Could you provide one? Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
