On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 02:41:20PM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote: > I'm not sure why this x-post over a dozen addresses, but if you wish so... > > Am Freitag, dem 10.09.2021 um 13:56 +0200 schrieb Bill Allombert: > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:05:32AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > The severity chosen for these tags/checks is not justified by any of our > > > > policies, neither the Debian policy, not the best packaging practises > > > > nor > > > > any legal reason! > > > > > > > > There is no technical nor social justification for this severity. > > > > > > > > making our package compliant to this new privacy-policy doesn't add > > > > any value to our users. > > [snip] > > > Thanks for taking this stance. Phoning home without the user consent has > > always been treated as a RC bug. > > Please provide examples. > > > Lintian errors do not by themselves create more work to package > > maintainers since they can be ignored, > > a) This is untrue. To put packages through NEW they have to be lintian clean.
Is it actually the case ? This is not my experience. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
