On Wed, 2021-09-08 at 13:53 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:37:37PM +0200, Ansgar wrote: > > Maybe we should just find out who is responsible for this decision > > and > > reassign the bug to them. The installer team maintaining d-i and > > debootstrap or the mirror team seem reasonable choices? > > We've already tried that approach on the /usr-merge and the resulting > transition is miserable. Let's not repeat that mistake.
So what do you suggest then? Tech-ctte as with merged-/usr? Or a GR? Or something else? > It's the same pattern actually: > * People propose a change that does have positive effects, though > some > find the positive effects unimportant. > * Other people disagree and raise concerns. > * Concerns are ignored. <- This is where we are with https-default. It's also where we are with keep-http-as-default. > Change has a cost. I do not want to pay the cost for either of these > changes. Then we could never change anything. To keep up with merged-/usr: keeping non-merged-/usr also has a cost. Nobody wants to pay the cost for it. Ansgar
