Nils <internation...@gmx.net> writes: > lockfile creation fails on a cifs mounted drive with "lockfile > creation failed: Value too large for defined data type"
Hmm, lockfile-create is really a very simple wrapper around a call to lockfile_create(1), and offhand, I don't see any obvious way the arguments being passed could be causing an EOVERFLOW. Offhand, I wonder if it's the liblockfile version difference. From a quick glance I see some upstream commits involving EOVERFLOW. If you can still reproduce the problem, you might be able to verify that by testing with dotlock instead of lockfile-create. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
