Hello! On Tue, 2021-08-31 at 15:19 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Chris, > > thanks for your bugreport, but it seems to me that reprotest is not > failing > but rather producing failure results when rebuilding your package. Is > that > correct? If so, it's not a bug in reprotest... :) >
It is producing failure results when I am updating the package, i.e. I have a new version and I update the Debian packaging. It fails the first time, but it seems that if I rerun reprotest later, it will pass. > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 09:33:26PM -0400, Christopher Talbot wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-08-30 at 18:00 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > Maybe when the job was first run, SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH was set to a > > > date > > > later than the file unpack times (e.g. maybe due to timezone?)... > > > and > > > thus wouldn't clamp the timestamps ... that might explain re- > > > running > > > the > > > job later suceeding. > > > > > > > > > live well, > > > vagrant > > > > Unfortunately, I do not know enough about reprotest to know what > > causes > > it. > > On a hunch, I also decided to rerun reprotest, and it worked this > > time: > > > https://salsa.debian.org/DebianOnMobile-team/vvmd/-/pipelines/283265 > > > > So it seems to be some sort of time/date dependent bug? > > Vagrant suggested a possible explaination... see above :) >
