> Thank you for your assistance. With hint for the relevant man
> page "bridge-utils-interfaces" I found the bridge setup working
> using the configuration
> 
> auto br0
> iface br0 inet static
>   address 192.168.1.1
>   network 192.168.1.0
>   netmask 255.255.255.0
>   bridge_ports none
>   bridge_hw 86:aa:aa:aa:aa:aa
> 
> With that there is no race observed, I deem this bug report as
> invalid.

Yes, that looks ok for a setup where you don't want to add any ports to a
bridge. 

> I tested without the legacy stuff, worked, making this bug report
> irrelevant. Testing how far the change can be backported is
> done on demand later, not relevant here (Bullseye).

I don't remember any reason why current bullseye package can't be used at
buster or prior versions.

Regards.
-- 
Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net

Reply via email to