Hi, On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 16:09:54 +0100 Ivo De Decker <iv...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 09:03:12PM +0000, Johannes 'josch' Schauer wrote: > > debian/tests/control: add isolation-machine (closes: #928364) > > I intend to revert this change. I checked with the maintainers of > ci.debian.net, and it currently doesn't run tests with isolation-machine, but > it is able to run the sbuild testuite in a container (probably with a > different setup than the one used by ubuntu). Adding this flag would mean the > autopkgtests wouldn't run in debian at all.
We recently changed the host that runs our armhf jobs and we are now seeing the same error, while our previous host didn't have the error. The hosts are different, but also the new host runs bullseye, while the former one ran buster. No clue if that matters. > Until we can come up with a better way to handle this, this should probably be > kept as a delta for the ubuntu package. I'd love to find out what's causing this (especially if we would need to make changes to the configuration of he host, but if we can't figure it out, I propose to either use the relatively new architecture field in the autopkgtest control file to exclude armhf (and armel) from running the test. Or use the skippable restriction and exit 77 if a host is detected that isn't suitable for the job. Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
