On Fri, 2021-07-16 at 02:25 +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > … this isn’t right. This is an RC bug in corekeeper but nōn-RC > in procps because of Policy §9.3.2:
I still think it is RC as it is a feature regression breaking install of reverse dependencies in supported configurations (sysvinit). > So I think it’d be better to clone the bugreport, asking procps nicely > to implement “reload” while fixing corekeeper for bullseye first. If the procps maintainer doesn't plan to fix this in bullseye and buster, then I guess I will have to workaround it in corekeeper. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
