On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 07:31:19AM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > There is no need to read the whole discussion. My bug submission > contains the most important parts. If you have any other questions, just > ask and I'll answer them on the bug. > > What other files do you have in mind that could managed similarly? > > Do I understand correctly that you agree with the approach taken in this > patch?
Yes, I think it's fine. I don't have any other files in mind, and I suppose the existence of {add,remove}-shell suggests that there are not any suitably similar files, but if there were I think it would be worth exploring some more generic mechanisms and naming.