On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:43:14AM -0600, Micah Anderson wrote: > I looked over the 2.6.10 changelogs and do not see this being either > fixed, or that particular file being changed. Although I do see that it > has changed slightly, the piece that is replaced in this patch is not > replaced here. As a result, I am not able to determine myself if > 2.6.10 is also susceptible, but instead hope you can determine this.
I think so too, it does not seem to have been applied upstream at all. Do you want to ping LKML and find out if there is a reason why? In the mean time I will go ahead and add it to 2.6.8 and 2.6.10. As for 2.4.27, i am not sure either. I will investigate further and report back. -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
