Hello, > My reading of the code is that it was intended to be > - t = set_byte(t, (j-1)%4, sbox[get_byte(k,j)]); > + t = set_byte(t, (j-1+4)%4, sbox[get_byte(k,j)]);
It's looking good, I have uploaded 1:1.0-10 to unstable, hopefully this was the only issue still affecting other archs. Thanks! -- Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
