On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 10:26:22PM +0200, Olivier Girondel wrote: > On 6/9/21 8:48 PM, Tobias Frost wrote: > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > Hi Tobias, > > Well this RFS is 4 months old, so yes it's a little late for it to reach > bullseye :)
(As this RFS was filed after the soft freeze deadline, it would not have reached bullseye. [1]) > We're about to relase 3.60 soon anyway, so depending on bullseye's release > date (do you have some idea btw ?) Well, the release date is traditionally "When it's ready(tm)" :). Said that, for a datapoint, [1] says the full-freeze is planned for early July… (<guessing> So maaaaaaayyyyyybeeee August? </guess>ing) > it might be possible that I close these RFS. You shouldn not close this RFS if you intend to have 3.60 soon; you would then need to reopen it, as one should "recycle" a RFS until it has been sponsored (to keep history, previous reviews, keep your spot in the queue [2], etc…) > Question: in case 3.55 and 3.56 never make it in Debian, should I remove the > entries from d/changelog ? I've seen both: removal and keeping… So you decide for yourself; if you keep the unreleased, mark them as UNRELEASED though. (my personal bikeshed color is to remove the unreleased ones and have the entries in the eventually uploaded version only;) [1] https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html [2] Disclaimer: I _usually_ take a look at the older open RFS first, but it is not FIFO. YMWV. -- tobi
