Hi Jonas! On Mon, 07 Jun 2021 at 21:54:50 +0200, Jonas Meurer wrote: >> I'm not sure how what the best way to proceed for Bullseye. Jonas, >> what's your take about this? > > First sorry for not responding earlier. I simply missed this mail in my > backlog :-/
No worries! > I would suggest to take the most pragmatic approach and don't care about > this corner case. Given that, no stable release ever shipped with a faulty > integritysetup and that I would expect every user who ran unstable/testing > back when keys hat 106 bytes to still run unstable/testing, let's just keep > it the way it is, no? Great, then we're on the same page :-) That's a good summary, AFAIK the only report so far is this bug from nbf who is using a 106 bytes truncation, and with that key size Bullseye's integritysetup isn't more broken than Buster's. So let's skip this for 11.0 and maybe revisit later via s-p-u if needs be. Thanks for the feedback! -- Guilhem.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
