Jörg, On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 12:38 PM Jörg Riesmeier <deb...@riesmeier.de> wrote: > > Hi Mathieu > > > I've removed explicit usage of ICU, since support will be equivalent > > when using stdlibc (iconv), with the added bonus that we remove a > > dependency to ICU. > > I'm not sure whether "stdlibc (iconv)" really supports all DICOM character > sets, e.g. "ISO 2022 IR 87" and "ISO 2022 IR 159" are not tested by the > regression test case "dcmdata_specificCharacterSet_1" (see "dcmdata/tests/ > tspchrs.cc"). > As far as I know, _all_ defined DICOM character sets only work as expected > when > using "libiconv", i.e. the original implementation (as explained before).
Yes, this is what I defined as "support will be equivalent". Further detailed at: * https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/dcmtk/-/commit/a533a4acb57242e8c9e9f011e3ba083c8382da97#92c53ca292f6a209c5328fba1c6a1801e28e51c3_151_163 Thanks again
