Paul Gevers wrote:
>> In contrast to normal upgrades of sendmail, during the upgrade of buster
>> to bullseye sendmail will be stopped, causing more downtime to the
>> service than other sendmail upgrades. Please read [1] for generic advice
>> on reducing downtime.
>> [1]
>> https://www.debian.org/releases/bullseye/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#services-downtime
>
> I guess this went below your radar as it was reassigned during this
> proposal. Can you please review and comment?
Oh, yes, in fact this looks like a package-specific issue of the sort
that I was just saying we didn't yet have any of to list at the end of
issues.dbk, but would we want it there or somewhere else?
It looks good, but of course as soon as I start thinking about how
you'd add the markup I start reorganising...
<title>sendmail downtime during upgrade</title>
<para>
In contrast to normal upgrades of
<systemitem role=package>sendmail</systemitem>, during the upgrade of
buster to bullseye the sendmail service will be stopped, causing more
downtime than usual. For generic advice on reducing downtime see
<xref linkend="services-downtime"/>.
</para>
--
JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian
sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package
