On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 02:37:59PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 23, Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > So why net.agent ends up being called for it? > > The funny thing is, that it doesn't for me. > Neither for me. > > > If you conpare the trace I sent and the one that Artur sent > > we see this difference > > > > Feb 11 00:12:42 blabluga udev[6599]: configured rule in > > '/etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules[98]' applied, 'tun' becomes 'net/%k' > > > > I checked and I don't have /etc/udev/rules.d/udev.rules on my system, > > but it seems to me that it is this file that is making the translation > > from misc to net. And it is this translation that I am wondering > > about the validity of. > No, udev has nothing to do with this, it's not how it works and it has > no way of changing the class of a device.
Ok, that is curious, because as I mentioned, I don't have that file and it seems to work fine. That is, I can't reproduce the problem. Artur, where did that file come from? Does it belong to a package? Can you attach it to your reply? -- Horms -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
