On Wed, 2021-03-17 at 09:48:35 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2021-03-16 13:47 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Could you perhaps add a backwards compatibility symlink for the time > > being? Or when using bash, perhaps even a warning based on the > > “caller” builtin if using the old pathname? > > Adding a compatibility symlink seems to be a non-starter with packages > installing files there. I think for now the change needs to be > reverted, and a transition plan worked out if moving git's libexecdir is > still desired.
Just to clarify, I meant compatibility symlinks for the script, not for the directory, either that or a wrapper could do too. But if this is affecting other stuff then reverting might be more prudent now. Thanks, Guillem
