[ValdikSS]
>  2. eatmydata and libeatmydata1 packages should present in ISO images
>     (/pool directory) to make eatmydata-udeb possible to use without the
>     internet (you say it downloads the packages when internet is
>     connected, I'm not sure it works though).

If it do not work, it is a bug that should be fixed.

>  3. eatmydata-udeb should also inject libeatmydata to the base system
>     installation process, which is performed by debootstrap. Base system
>     installation is also quite slow, not as slow as the main system due
>     to much less package count, but still takes much more time than it
>     should.

While I agree, I have no idea how to sensible do this, ie how to
convince debootstrap to use libeatmydata.  In short, I do not believe it
can be done without changing debootstrap, so I did not do it. :)

> With this script, patched debian-10.6.0-amd64-DVD-1.iso ISO file which
> previously took 1 hour, 44 minutes, 30 seconds to install, now
> installs in 10 minutes 37 seconds.  Patched netinstall image, when run
> without the internet access, installs the whole mini distro with base
> utilities in less than 3 minutes.

I hope you will blog about this, email debian-boot@ and convince the
people on #debian-boot that enabling eatmydata-udeb by default is a good
idea.  I just do not have the capacity to work on this myself, but I
agree completely that a quicker installation is something to go for. :)

> If #2 (packages in iso image) it not an eatmydata-udeb packaging
> concern, please tell for which package I should create a bug, it's not
> clear for me.

Part of it is for the d-i teams (aka the debian-boot related contact
points mentioned above to decide.  I suspect eatmydata is has done as
much as can be done in the package, and the rest need to be fixed
elsewhere. :)

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply via email to