The Wanderer <wande...@fastmail.fm> writes: > On 2021-03-12 at 05:32, Arto Jantunen wrote: >> We might as well just remove it for now, we can easily bring it back >> if we can come up with a plausible story about the licensing >> situation. > > If you think that's OK for the package (and its users, who may or may > not care about completion), then I'm fine with it for the moment.
I don't think we have a massive number of users anyway, and they can still manually install the completion if they need it. In any case, having the package without completion is probably preferable to not having the package at all. > Would this call for an upstream release dropping the file, or are you OK > with excluding it from what gets installed as part of the package? I'd prefer an upstream release if you don't feel strongly about it, I think otherwise I need to filter the upstream tarball and I'd rather not. -- Arto Jantunen
