Hi Andreas, Thanks for filing 984929. Do you have a sense for what the cutoff should be for trying to get 984929 resolved vs. just uploading a workaround in the dkms-consuming packages (e.g., openafs)?
Thanks, Ben On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:09:06PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing control commands: > > > block 984862 with -1 > Bug #984862 [iptables-netflow-dkms] iptables-netflow-dkms: module wants to > build with gcc instead of kernel's compiler > 984862 was not blocked by any bugs. > 984862 was not blocking any bugs. > Added blocking bug(s) of 984862: 984929 > > block 945506 with -1 > Bug #945506 [openafs-modules-dkms] openafs-modules-dkms: module wants to > build with gcc instead of kernel's compiler > 945506 was not blocked by any bugs. > 945506 was not blocking any bugs. > Added blocking bug(s) of 945506: 984929 > > block 946497 with -1 > Bug #946497 [zfs-dkms] zfs-dkms: module wants to build with gcc instead of > kernel's compiler > 946497 was not blocked by any bugs. > 946497 was not blocking any bugs. > Added blocking bug(s) of 946497: 984929 > > -- > 945506: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945506 > 946497: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946497 > 984862: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984862 > 984929: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984929 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems >
