On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: > [adding release team] > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta <utka...@debian.org> wrote: > > Hi Praveen, > > > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen > > <prav...@onenetbeyond.org> wrote: > > > It looks like we will have to remove ruby-vcr and we will have to > > > disable tests for the following packages. I don't think there is > > > another way, thoughts? > > > > Maybe worth opening an issue upstream and discuss the cons of this > > change or something? Or if that doesn't work out > > and we need this > > I doubt discussing with upstream will yield any possitive outcome as this is > a specific philosophical movement. > > See https://github.com/vcr/vcr/pull/792 > and > https://github.com/vcr/vcr/issues/804 > > > package or something, would forking be an option? > > https://github.com/vcr/vcr/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#510-feb-5-2020 > > We will have to go back to 5.0 and someone will have to maintain it > independently. > > Hi Release team, > > Do you think this needs to be fixed before bullseye? If yes, do you agree to > change the reverse dependencies listed in my previous message to this bug?
I don't think that will be needed. I reverted to 5.0.0 locally, added a few patches, and at least all of our reverse dependencies seem to pass their tests with it: ======================================================================== = Testing reverse (build) dependencies ======================================================================== rebuild nanoc ... PASS rebuild ruby-coveralls ... PASS autopkgtest ruby-faraday ... PASS rebuild ruby-graphlient ... PASS rebuild ruby-mixlib-install ... PASS rebuild ruby-octokit ... PASS So in principle we could fix this issue without touching anything else.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
