Hi Tianon, On 25-02-2021 20:40, Tianon Gravi wrote: > Hi Paul! Thanks for filing these -- I've pushed two commits to the > Git repo which fix both 983512 and 983513 (and made it more forgiving > of other architectures for the future).
Can't you skip the hash test (but still run all the rest) on other archs? If yes, then your d/t/control is OK, but if you only intend this to be run on amd64 and arm64, there's a # in d/t/control that shouldn't be there. > I haven't uploaded yet because I'm concerned about / very unfamiliar > with the appropriate paperwork while we're in freeze, and don't want > to do anything wrong. :) We're in soft freeze [1], no paperwork is needed except if your package is in the (build-)essential set: https://release.debian.org/bullseye/essential-and-build-essential.txt. > If I do the upload, is there someone who can help me with the > necessary paperwork to make sure this isn't blocking / breaking anyone > else? O:) Minus my remark above, you changes look OK from a quick glance. Paul [1] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#soft
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
