On 2/7/21 2:00 PM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > I'm not sure how you've reached that conclusion. dak definitely > disagrees: > > $ dak rm -Rn cdrkit > Will remove the following packages from unstable:
I know what dak says I looked that up myself after you made that statement. I previously thought that libburnia is already being used by all relevant packages and that cdrkit is required only for mkisofs, in particular for creating ISO images with a HFS (not HFS+) filesystem. If cdrkit is actually being used by so many packages, then it should have been in much better shape before being shipped with a Debian release. Just painting over this single issue is not the right approach in my opinion and there are certainly more issues with cdrkit than just the FTBFS. The number of patches in the Fedora package speaks for itself [1]. I don't think we're doing ourselves a favor by rushing hotfixes in to get these packages into the next release. Adrian > [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cdrkit/tree/rawhide -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
