Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: important

Hey,

Someone recently brought to my attention
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972181 and the
corresponding meeting notes at
http://meetbot.debian.net/debian-ftp/2020/debian-ftp.2020-03-13-20.02.html.
These notes claim that OpenSSL can be treated as a system library for
the purposes of the GPLv2, like Fedora does.

Unfortunately, I believe the license is very clear and it doesn't agree.
From the GPL version 2:

  For an executable work, complete source code means all the source code
  for all modules it contains, plus any associated interface definition
  files, plus the scripts used to control compilation and installation
  of the executable.  However, as a special exception, the source code
  distributed need not include anything that is normally distributed (in
  either source or binary form) with the major components (compiler,
  kernel, and so on) of the operating system on which the executable
  runs, unless that component itself accompanies the executable.

Note the phrase "unless that component itself accompanies the
executable."  It's long been my interpretation, as with other
contributors, that this applies to distribution from the same mirror
archive.  In any event, it's obvious that it applies to the same
distribution medium, and Debian ships DVD and disk images from its
infrastructure.

There have been numerous arguments on debian-devel in the past about
support for dpkg linked against a Solaris-derived libc for Nextenta OS
in which copyright holders have upheld this policy.

I'd like to ask you to reconsider this decision at your earliest
convenience and update the bug report.  I will follow up with Fedora
separately and ask them to update their policy as well.

I ask this of you not only as an on-and-off contributor to Debian, but
also as a copyright holder in numerous pieces of software in Debian,
both GPL and non-GPL.  One of the things I've long appreciated about
Debian has been its focus on doing the right thing with regard to
licensing, and I think this misses the mark there.
-- 
brian m. carlson (he/him or they/them)
Houston, Texas, US

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to