Mike Hommey writes ("Re: Bug#362190: xpcshell et al - instructions for
running"):
> I was actually wondering if it was any useful to provide xpidl,
> xpcshell, xpt_link and xpt_dump on our builds, since we don't provide
> the development files anyway.
xpcshell at least lets you play around with js a bit.
> The development stuff is available in the xulrunner package.
But I do take your point.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
