Control: reassign -1 dictionaries-common-dev,vim El lun, 18 ene 2021 a las 19:34, Agustin Martin (<agmar...@debian.org>) escribió: > El lun, 18 ene 2021 a las 13:54, Kurt Roeckx (<k...@roeckx.be>) escribió: > > > > Vim has support for spellchecking using it's own spell check > > > > files. It can be generated based on hunspell .aff/.dic files, or > > > > based on a wordlist. Files currently need to be placed in > > > > /usr/share/vim/vim82/spell/ ... > > > This was mentioned a while ago in #490987. It was closed because at > > > that time building vim spell files creation seemed to be very memory > > > intensive and using libhunspell via a redhat patch was under > > > consideration. I have no idea about current status of spellchecking in > > > vim and if those concerns were addressed. ... > I do not object adding a vim section to policy if there is need to > coordinate with packages outside the vim environment. However, from > what I seem to understand, everything is inside vim ecosystem. > spellchecker is part of vim, hunspell dicts need to be adapted for vim > and this spellchecking facility seems not to be used outside vim.
Hi, Kurt and James, I am temporarily reassigning this bug report to both vim and dictionaries-common-dev, so vim maintaners are aware of it and can share their POV. I will not go anywhere without their approval. I have been looking at https://github.com/vim/vim/tree/master/runtime/spell and http://snapshot.debian.org/package/vim-spellfiles/ to have an idea about this issue. Seems vim uses myspell dictionaries (or early hunspell dicts). Current hunspell dicts normally use a number of things that seem unsupported by vim spellchecker, so while using recent hunspell dicts may appear to work, it will likely work worse than old files. I can think of two approaches, resurrecting vim-spellfiles package and/or creating vim dicts from packages currently using a myspell dict (normally as a source for aspell dict). Have to ellaborate a bit more. James, ¿what do you think about this? Regards, -- Agustin