On 21/01 12:46, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > I can create an issue in the original fork. However, just know that > this library is *not* being maintained at all. So there won't be much > help from anywhere.
I'm not expecting upstream to fix it either, but it'd feel more comfortable to close this bug on our side while still linking to an existing upstream issue. > Either way, I'd also like to mention that we did a build for > ruby-in-parallel against ruby3.0 and everything seems to work, > including those tests as well. Ideally we'd only skip this test in 2.x, while keeping it in 3.0 to see if same race eventually pops up on debci. Cheers, -- Seb
