dear all, I just uploaded a 0.66 *before* reading this message
when I checked 0.65+nmu it seemed it was fine in this respect before creating 0.66, I did # grep -e isAlive -r . and I did not see any occurrence so hopefully it will be OK a. Il 18/01/21 18:59, Calum McConnell ha scritto: > On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 14:41 +0100, Steven De Herdt wrote: >> reopen 979966 >> thanks >> >> This report actually concerns 0.65+nmu1: /usr/bin/debdelta is identical >> to the one in 0.65. Something must have gone wrong in the NMU... >> >> Thanks for the work on this package! >> -Steven > I can confirm that is true. It's almost certainly something I screwed up, > and now that A. Mennucc1 is back, the solution will probably be to upload > a new 0.66 rather than a +nmu2. > > I'm not sure quite HOW I managed to mess it up, but I have a feeling it is > because I wasn't careful enough in keeping track of what changes I made to > which versions. It's probably the direct result of me using a patch to > copy over the changelog (instead of, you know, just copy-pasting): but as > I prepared the NMU in /tmp, I can't say for sure. Suffice it to say I am > whacking my head against the wall for not checking one final time whether > there were any more occurences of isAlive(). > > A. Mennucc, any chance of doing a full upload sometime soon, to hopefully > prevent my mistake from entering Bullseye's final release? > > Thanks, > Calum > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
