(pardon the duplicate -- I accidentally did reply to sender instead of reply 
all)

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021, at 7:55 PM, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear Jay,
> 
> On Mon 18 Jan 2021 at 05:35PM -05, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> 
> > Package: pikepdf
> > Version: 1.17.3+dfsg-2
> > X-Debbugs-CC: q...@debian.org
> >
> > This is a request to please upload the latest pikepdf to sid. Right now, 
> > qpdf 10.1.0 is not able to transition to testing because autopkgtest is 
> > failing because of a regression in pikepdf. The problem is actually in 
> > pikepdf, and the pikepdf author resolved the issue within 24 hours of my 
> > release of qpdf 10.1.0.
> >
> > Reference: https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=qpdf
> >
> > Please let me know if any additional information is required. (I am the 
> > debian maintainer and  upstream author of qpdf.)
> >
> > Also please let me know if you would like me to do an NMU. I can, but I'd 
> > prefer not to have to do it. Thanks.
> 
> There are two blockers:
> 
> 1) we're in the transitions freeze, so updating pikepdf would need
>    permission from the release team

Oops, I forgot that was already going on.

> 2) pikepdf has undergone a license change, and someone on the Debian
>    side needs to look over upstream's work in contacting all
>    copyright holders and having them okay it, and d/copyright needs
>    updating.
> 
> Additionally, new releases of pikepdf typically involve a lot of work
> updating d/copyright for new test resources.
> 
> So, perhaps we could just backport the fix?

Sure, I think that would work. I will ask upstream about it and/or try to come 
up with a patch. I know there were two small fixes, both simple. I'll let you 
know as soon as I can.

--Jay

Reply via email to