On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 11:01:12PM +0000, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Or is there any reason offlineimap3 should not be in bullseye? > > But offlineimap3 can only migrate after offlineimap is removed and > src:python-imaplib2 drops its python2 package, so I guess its better > to go ahead with the RM while I wait for upstream's reply. If it is > not removed by then, then I will upload the transitional package like > Mattia suggested.
Then, what about this other way:
* src:python-imaplib2 drops its python2 lib
* ftp-master forces its removal, while keeping src:offlineimap
?
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
