On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Cord Beermann wrote: > Hallo! Du (Thiemo Seufer) hast geschrieben: > > > > >what about that? > > > > > > > >debian-devel-kernel@ > > > > I would personally prefer debian-kernel-devel, but in the end of the day > > > it is not that important. If you have any reasons to prefer > > > debian-devel-kernel over debian-kernel-devel, go ahead with it. We are > > > drowning in bug traffic on debian-kernel, so i'm pretty sure that the new > > > list, whatever the name is, will be welcome :-). > > > > I would also prefer debian-kernel-devel, just because it sorts the > > mbox names nicely together. :-) > > :-) > > debian-kernel-maint?
debian-kernel-bugs ? If this is to hold the bug reports, it is more logical. The debian-kernel is by definition a devel list, so having d-k-fdevel in addition will probabluy be confusing. > on second thought, we run in the problem that Debian these days > supports more than one kernel, which already lead to changes of > package names. Well; the idea was that this list was open to all debian kernels, not just the linux ones. This didn'r really happen though, but i think it is still true. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
