Hi Thomas,

The reason I kept 0.2.5 and not 0.2.6, is because 0.2.5 is the version
> in the OpenStack tested environment.
>
Oh okay, I had no idea.

Yeah I have time for the merge request.

This is the correct link for the repo yes?
https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-etcd3gw

Thank you,
Heather Lemon

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:30 AM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote:

> On 1/13/21 9:05 PM, Heather Lemon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > For the python-etcd3gw package update..
> > Could we include this patch [0] to the 0.2.5-1 update?
> >
> > The patch adds a description of the exception if one gets thrown.
> > As well as an additional unit test.
> >
> > Just for clarification, the reason we went to v0.2.5 and not v0.2.6 was
> > the commit "Make API path
> > configurable"(20b4fca3640bb77b957cc57aef0d114e547e593b)
> > breaks existing unit tests, and is not yet in a fixed release. Is that
> > correct?
>
> Hi Heather,
>
> The reason I kept 0.2.5 and not 0.2.6, is because 0.2.5 is the version
> in the OpenStack tested environment. I always update my packages
> according to it, meaning they get an update every 6 months. I don't know
> if 0.2.6 is working well with oslo.cache / tooz for Victoria.
>
> I don't mind adding such a commit as a Debian patch. But would you have
> time to do it as a merge request on Salsa?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>


-- 
Heather Lemon
Associate Software Engineer (STS Engineering)
P: +1-719-415-8858
MM: hlemon | hypothetical-lemon
www.canonical.com | www.ubuntu.com

Reply via email to