Hi Thomas, The reason I kept 0.2.5 and not 0.2.6, is because 0.2.5 is the version > in the OpenStack tested environment. > Oh okay, I had no idea.
Yeah I have time for the merge request. This is the correct link for the repo yes? https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/python/python-etcd3gw Thank you, Heather Lemon On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:30 AM Thomas Goirand <z...@debian.org> wrote: > On 1/13/21 9:05 PM, Heather Lemon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > For the python-etcd3gw package update.. > > Could we include this patch [0] to the 0.2.5-1 update? > > > > The patch adds a description of the exception if one gets thrown. > > As well as an additional unit test. > > > > Just for clarification, the reason we went to v0.2.5 and not v0.2.6 was > > the commit "Make API path > > configurable"(20b4fca3640bb77b957cc57aef0d114e547e593b) > > breaks existing unit tests, and is not yet in a fixed release. Is that > > correct? > > Hi Heather, > > The reason I kept 0.2.5 and not 0.2.6, is because 0.2.5 is the version > in the OpenStack tested environment. I always update my packages > according to it, meaning they get an update every 6 months. I don't know > if 0.2.6 is working well with oslo.cache / tooz for Victoria. > > I don't mind adding such a commit as a Debian patch. But would you have > time to do it as a merge request on Salsa? > > Cheers, > > Thomas Goirand (zigo) > -- Heather Lemon Associate Software Engineer (STS Engineering) P: +1-719-415-8858 MM: hlemon | hypothetical-lemon www.canonical.com | www.ubuntu.com