Package: bindfs
Version: 1.14.7-1
Followup-For: Bug #951208

On 18/02/2020 14:07, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> How common of a use case is to use bindfs with a non-empty mount point? I 
> never mounted filesystems like that myself, so
> I don't know if it's a minor nuisance with an easy workaround, or a 
> significant limitation making some use case
> unachievable.

I use bindfs to redirect heavy I/O away from my SSD from the Firefox cache, 
when visiting some specific sites, because
it does not support XDG_CACHE_HOME:

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259356


On 21/02/2020 10:02, Willem Mulder wrote:
> At our association we have shared home directories (over NFS), but on
> one particular server, our remote desktop server, we have the XDG
> config, data and cache directories on separate HDDs. We're using bindfs
> to mount them onto their default locations, since not all software uses
> the XDG environment variables. People can also run software on other
> servers, so we do need (the ability) to mount over nonempty directories.

If that can be helpful, the arch wiki has a comprehensive list of apps that do 
not follow the XDG spec, or follow it
in part:

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/XDG_Base_Directory

Reply via email to