Am Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:05:48AM +0100 schrieb Moritz Schlarb:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On 10.11.19 21:51, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Moritz,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
>
> Same here ;)
>
> > It depends, and there is not rule written in stone. In this case I was
> > thinking of concluding to keep the issue open until at least upstream
> > clarifies on
> > https://github.com/haiwen/seafile/issues/350#issuecomment-548307815
> > (respectively if there will be a step towards not only making version
> > 3 the fefault but disalowing as well the older formats).
> >
> > Do you disagree or agree on that?
>
> Yes, we can of course keep it open at least until then, I will ask there
> again.
Circling back to this when reviewing open security issues in bullseye.
I think we can simply mark this as fixed in seafile 7 (with 7.0.2-1 the
first in unstable), since it offers format 3? This is pretty much the
same as for other tools which offer non-ideal legacy formats (like
Debian still shipping GnuPG 1 for backwards compat, there's no need
to wait to disable the old format to mark this as fully fixed.
Cheers,
Moritz
