On Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:36:39 +0100 Michael Prokop <m...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > * Michael Prokop [Wed Jul 03, 2019 at 11:59:23AM +0200]: > > * Benjamin Drung [Wed Apr 03, 2019 at 12:11:55PM +0200]: > > > > I refreshed the patches on top of version 5.3.0 and pushed it to > > > https://salsa.debian.org/bdrung/reprepro/ and > > > https://github.com/profitbricks/reprepro > > > Thanks for your efforts, Benjamin, highly appreciated.
I have tested the above branch (mostly 'include' and 'export' commands)
and generally it works fine. I've found one weird corner case related to
updating from older reprepro (5.1.1, without the patches), possibly db
format:
- packages that were in the db before update, are no longer included in
generated metadata ('export' command), unless added again with
'include' command
- 'dumpreferences' _does_ include those missing packages
It may be also that I'm missing some explicit db conversion step (I
haven't done anything, just updated reprepro package).
--
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
