Hi all-- GnuPG is team-maintained -- i've uploaded most of the recent uploads, but i'm definitely not intending to be the sole maintainer, and i would be happy to have more active contributors to the team:
https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/GnuPG Thanks Gniibe and Christoph for your work on this! Thanks gniibe in particular for your updates to patches that seem relevant for debian work but might not be carried upstream in 2.2. i can review and upload this work in the followin gweek if that'd be helpful, but i also don't object to anyone picking this up and running with it in a responsible way. Thanks all, --dkg On Thu 2021-01-07 12:08:51 +0900, NIIBE Yutaka wrote: > Hello, > > On 2021-01-05 +0100, Christoph Biedl <debian.a...@manchmal.in-ulm.de> wrote: >> | missing upstream releases, >> >> Several. Debian has 2.20, uploaded in March. Upstream is at 2.26. > > FYI, I tried to build GnuPG 2.2.26-1-of-mine package: > > https://salsa.debian.org/gniibe/gnupg2 > > I did: > > * fetch by 'git fetch <upstream-repo-url>' > * import upstream tar balls by 'gbp import-orig' > * refresh patches > * add a line to debian/rules for Windows (building regexp.a). > * follow the changes of upstream (gpgsplit and symcryptrun). > * merge pull request for scdaemon configuration > * add one patch of mine to fix #868550, #972525. > > It builds well for me (and works for me). > > I have no intention of NMU at all for this work. As one of upstream > maintainers, I'd like to make sure Debian version of GnuPG works well. > Please note that the patch for #868550, #972525 is a backport from > master, which is only for Debian (it won't be in 2.2 series of > upstream). > > I hope my changes above help Debian GnuPG packaging. > -- > > _______________________________________________ > pkg-gnupg-maint mailing list > pkg-gnupg-ma...@alioth-lists.debian.net > https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-gnupg-maint
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
