Andreas Henriksson <andr...@fatal.se> writes:
> Could you please try using `dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us`, rather than
> directly invoking debian/rules, and see if it helps you detect any
> misconfigurations in your build environment?
Just tried again in a new debian/testing64 VM (via vagrant). It still
fails in the same way with "debian/rules binary", and fails in a new way
(dh_missing error) with "dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us".
Exact commands (suspect a current testing schroot would behave
similarly, but haven't tested that yet):
$ mkdir tmp-mailutils-test
$ cd tmp-mailutils-test
$ vagrant init debian/testing64
$ vagrant up
$ vagrant ssh
$ sudo -i
# apt update
# apt dist-upgrade
# apt build-dep mailutils
# apt source mailutils
# cd mailutils-3.10
# dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us
...
make[1]: Entering directory '/root/mailutils-3.10'
dh_fixperms -Xdotlock.mailutils
make[1]: Leaving directory '/root/mailutils-3.10'
dh_missing
dh_missing: warning: usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/mailutils-mh.el exists in
debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere (related file:
"debian/tmp/usr/share/mailutils/mh/mailutils-mh.el")
dh_missing: warning: usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/mailutils-mh.elc exists in
debian/tmp but is not installed to anywhere
While detecting missing files, dh_missing noted some files with a
similar name to those
that were missing. This error /might/ be resolved by replacing
references to the
missing files with the similarly named ones that dh_missing found -
assuming the content
is identical.
As an example, you might want to replace:
* debian/tmp/usr/share/mailutils/mh/mailutils-mh.el
with:
* usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/mailutils-mh.el
in a file in debian/ or as argument to one of the dh_* tools called
from debian/rules.
(Note it is possible the paths are not used verbatim but instead
directories
containing or globs matching them are used instead)
Alternatively, add the missing file to debian/not-installed if it
cannot and should not
be used.
The following debhelper tools have reported what they installed (with
files per package)
* dh_install: libmailutils-dev (115), libmailutils7 (36), libmu-dbm7
(2), mailutils (10), mailutils-common (14), mailutils-comsatd (1),
mailutils-doc (1), mailutils-guile (2), mailutils-imap4d
(1), mailutils-mda (3), mailutils-mh (46), mailutils-pop3d (2),
python3-mailutils (23)
* dh_installdocs: libmailutils-dev (0), libmailutils7 (0),
libmu-dbm7 (0), mailutils (0), mailutils-common (0), mailutils-comsatd (0),
mailutils-doc (6), mailutils-guile (0), mailutils-imap4d (0), mailutils-mda
(0), mailutils-mh (1), mailutils-pop3d (0), python3-mailutils (0)
* dh_installexamples: libmailutils-dev (0), libmailutils7 (0),
libmu-dbm7 (0), mailutils (1), mailutils-common (0), mailutils-comsatd (1),
mailutils-doc (0), mailutils-guile (1), mailutils-imap4d (1), mailutils-mda
(0), mailutils-mh (0), mailutils-pop3d (1), python3-mailutils (0)
* dh_installman: libmailutils-dev (2), libmailutils7 (0), libmu-dbm7
(0), mailutils (10), mailutils-common (0), mailutils-comsatd (1), mailutils-doc
(0), mailutils-guile (0), mailutils-imap4d (1), mailutils-mda (3), mailutils-mh
(0), mailutils-pop3d (2), python3-mailutils (0)
If the missing files are installed by another tool, please file a bug
against it.
When filing the report, if the tool is not part of debhelper itself,
please reference the
"Logging helpers and dh_missing" section from the "PROGRAMMING" guide
for debhelper (10.6.3+).
(in the debhelper package: /usr/share/doc/debhelper/PROGRAMMING.gz)
Be sure to test with dpkg-buildpackage -A/-B as the results may vary
when only a subset is built
If the omission is intentional or no other helper can take care of
this consider adding the
paths to debian/not-installed.
dh_missing: error: missing files, aborting
make: *** [debian/rules:4: binary] Error 255
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules binary subprocess returned exit status
2
It's trivial to reproduce with those commands, so happy to gather any
addiitonal information you might like.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2011-07-10 E6A9 DA3C C9FD 1FF8 C676 D2C4 C0F0 39E9 ED1B 597A
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
