Oh well, proftpd-mod-dnsbl is now obsoleted by proftpd-core who also Provides
it in sid, and the source package should be removed in testing/sid
to allow migration of current proftpd. I have a lapsus about that, should
I ask an explicit remove to d-release?
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 11:08:09PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: proftpd-mod-dnsbl
Version: 0.1.5-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Tags: bullseye sid ftbfs
Usertags: ftbfs-20201226 ftbfs-bullseye
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
make[1]: Entering directory '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>'
DESTDIR=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/proftpd-mod-dnsbl prxs -c mod_dnsbl.c
Cannot compile mod_dnsbl using prxs; use existing ./configure script instead:
./configure
make
make install
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:15: override_dh_auto_build] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2020/12/26/proftpd-mod-dnsbl_0.1.5-5_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with me
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on EC2 VM instances from
Amazon Web Services, using a clean, minimal and up-to-date chroot. Every
failed build was retried once to eliminate random failures.
_______________________________________________
Pkg-proftpd-maintainers mailing list
pkg-proftpd-maintain...@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-proftpd-maintainers
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
