Quoting Pirate Praveen (2020-12-18 18:28:40) > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 17:28, Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk> wrote: > > Package: jest > > Version: 26.6.3+repack+~cs61.38.31-2 > > Followup-For: Bug #977670 > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Control: reoen -1 > > Control: retitle -1 jest: should explicitly (build-)depend on needed > > babel modules > > > > Thanks for clarifying that this issue is not scenario a). > > > > Now, please either... > > > > b) if only some embedded modules need babel-related modules at > > runtime, > > and jest does not need those at runtime, > > then move them to a package which itself need babel at runtime, > > otherwise > > c) explicitly depend on the (possibly virtual) module packages needed > > > > > > I.e. in any case it is wrong to declare (build-)dependency on > > "node-babel7" because that package name represents a *bundle* of > > modules, not explicit modules. > > > > In short: please explicitly (build-)depend on needed babel modules > > > > Explicitly, not implicitly through bundle-package (which may change > > content in future!). > > This does not work for buster-backports. I had to change dependency to > node-debbundle-acorn from virtual packages in webpack and rollup for > packages that build depends on webpack or rollup to work.
Sounds like a change specific to backports, not for official Debian. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
